Potential of Kalanchoe pinnata as a Cancer Treatment Adjuvant and an Epigenetic Regulator.

Cancer is a global public health problem that is related to different environmental and lifestyle factors. Although the combination of screening, prevention, and treatment of cancer has resulted in increased patient survival, conventional treatments sometimes have therapeutic limitations such as resistance to drugs or severe side effects. Oriental culture includes herbal medicine as a complementary therapy in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. This study aimed to identify the bioactive ingredients in Kalanchoe pinnata, a succulent herb with ethnomedical applications for several diseases, including cancer, and reveal its anticancer mechanisms through a molecular approach. The herb contains gallic acid, caffeic acid, coumaric acid, quercetin, quercitrin, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, bersaldegenin, bryophyllin a, bryophyllin c, bryophynol, bryophyllol and bryophollone, stigmasterol, campesterol, and other elements. Its phytochemicals participate in the regulation of proliferation, apoptosis, cell migration, angiogenesis, metastasis, oxidative stress, and autophagy. They have the potential to act as epigenetic drugs by reverting the acquired epigenetic changes associated with tumor resistance to therapy-such as the promoter methylation of suppressor genes, inhibition of DNMT1 and DNMT3b activity, and HDAC regulation-through methylation, thereby regulating the expression of genes involved in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR, Nrf2/Keap1, MEK/ERK, and Wnt/ß-catenin pathways. All of the data support the use of K. pinnata as an adjuvant in cancer treatment.

ADXS11-001 LM-LLO as specific immunotherapy in cervical cancer.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a well-known cause of cervical cancer. Therapeutic cancer vaccines are part of the current therapeutic options for HPV-associated cancers. Axalimogen filolisbac (ADXS11-001) is an immunotherapy based on live attenuated Listeria monocytogenes-listeriolysin O (Lm-LLO), designed by biological engineering to secrete an antigen-adjuvant fusion protein, composed of a truncated fragment of LLO fused to HPV. The proposed mechanism of action is that Lm-based vectors infect antigen-presenting cells (APC) and secrete HPV-LLO fusion proteins within the APC cytoplasm, these proteins are processed and presented to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), thus generating a new population of CTLs specific to HPV antigens. These HPV-specific CTLs destroy HPV infected cells. ADXS11-001 has demonstrated safety results in phase I-II studies in women with cervical cancer and is being assessed in clinical trials in patients with HPV-positive anal canal and head and neck cancers.

Recommendations on the pharmacological treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer in Mexico.

Ovarian cancer is the third most frequent gynaecological malignancy worldwide and in Mexico, with a high mortality rate, due to that in many cases its diagnosis is made in advanced stages. Prognosis is important for determining the subtype and the degree of evolution. During lasts years, the management of ovarian cancer has undergone an important evolution with the incorporation of new therapeutic options, which in turn represent an increase in the survival of these patients. We present recommendations for the management of ovarian cancer developed by an expert panel Mexican based on available evidence so far and the characteristics of health care in the country.

El cáncer de ovario es la tercera neoplasia maligna ginecológica más frecuente globalmente y también en México, con una elevada tasa de mortalidad debido a que en muchos casos su diagnóstico se realiza en etapas avanzadas. Para establecer su pronóstico es importante la determinación del subtipo y del grado de evolución. En los últimos años, el manejo del cáncer de ovario ha sufrido una importante evolución con la incorporación de nuevas opciones terapéuticas, que a su vez representan un incremento en la supervivencia de estas pacientes. Se presentan las recomendaciones para el manejo del cáncer de ovario elaboradas por un panel de expertos mexicanos basadas en la evidencia disponible hasta el momento y en las características de la atención sanitaria del país.

Recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento farmacológico del cáncer de ovario epitelial en México / Recommendations on the pharmacological treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer in Mexico

Resumen El cáncer de ovario es la tercera neoplasia maligna ginecológica más frecuente globalmente y también en México, con una elevada tasa de mortalidad debido a que en muchos casos su diagnóstico se realiza en etapas avanzadas. Para establecer su pronóstico es importante la determinación del subtipo y del grado de evolución. En los últimos años, el manejo del cáncer de ovario ha sufrido una importante evolución con la incorporación de nuevas opciones terapéuticas, que a su vez representan un incremento en la supervivencia de estas pacientes. Se presentan las recomendaciones para el manejo del cáncer de ovario elaboradas por un panel de expertos mexicanos basadas en la evidencia disponible hasta el momento y en las características de la atención sanitaria del país.

Abstract Ovarian cancer is the third most frequent gynaecological malignancy worldwide and in Mexico, with a high mortality rate, due to that in many cases its diagnosis is made in advanced stages. Prognosis is important for determining the subtype and the degree of evolution. During lasts years, the management of ovarian cancer has undergone an important evolution with the incorporation of new therapeutic options, which in turn represent an increase in the survival of these patients. We present recommendations for the management of ovarian cancer developed by an expert panel Mexican based on available evidence so far and the characteristics of health care in the country.

Cancer pain management: recommendations from a Latin-American experts panel.

Generating a consensus in the Latin-American region on cancer pain management is a current need. Thus a panel of Latin-American experts met in Madrid in March 2017 in order to review the published literature, discuss the best approach for cancer pain classification and evaluation and also make recommendations of pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies for cancer pain management improvement in Latin-American countries. The result of that meeting is presented in this document. The experts participating were from Costa Rica, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Brazil and Ecuador, and the project coordinator was from Spain.

Use of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: report from the Mexican opinion and analysis forum on colorectal cancer treatment with bevacizumab (September 2009).

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and although associated mortality rates in South American countries are generally among the lowest in the world, they are on the rise. The prognosis of patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer has improved markedly over the last 12 years, increasing from 5 months with best supportive care to almost 2 years with combination chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. New prognostic and predictive biomarkers have been identified to guide therapy. Prognostic markers indicate patient survival independent of therapy and include disease stage, mutational status, and carcinoembryonic antigen. More recently, predictive markers of treatment outcomes have been identified. The most studied are mutations of the KRAS and BRAF genes, which are associated with resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy. Tumor blood vessels have a number of structural and functional abnormalities that result in increased tumor vascularity and growth driven by angiogenesis. The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, which binds to and neutralizes VEGF-A, has become a central part of the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin, irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/leucovorin, or irinotecan plus infusional 5-FU/leucovorin significantly improves the overall survival of patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. In addition, a significant increase in overall survival is seen when bevacizumab is added to oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFOX) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed on a non-bevacizumab-containing regimen. Although the majority of studies were performed prior to the identification of KRAS and BRAF as predictive biomarkers, subsequent analysis has shown the benefits of bevacizumab occur independently of the mutational status of these genes. In patients who have progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen, continuation of bevacizumab is significantly associated with an improved survival based on observational cohort studies. Surgical resection is recommended in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer where complete removal of tumors can be achieved. Perioperative chemotherapy using FOLFOX for 3 months before and 3 months after surgery is associated with a 9% improvement in 3-year survival. The use of chemotherapy in patients initially deemed unresectable has produced resection rates approaching 40%, and the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in this setting is feasible, safe, and effective. In a study of 219 patients, the addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOX was associated with a significant increase in major or complete pathologic response compared with FOLFOX alone. Improvements in patient survival have changed the treatment paradigm for metastatic colorectal cancer. Newer approaches view treatment not as distinct lines of therapy but as a continuum that includes personalized treatment plans offering maintenance therapy and even drug holidays between aggressive treatment periods. This approach achieves similar efficacy outcomes with reduced toxicity, and investigation of the role of bevacizumab as maintenance therapy is ongoing.

[Concomitant treatment with gemcitabine and radiotherapy in patients with advanced stages of epidermoid carcinoma originating in the head and neck. A phase II sutdy]. / Tratamiento concomitante con gemcitabina y radioterapia en pacientes con carcinoma epidermoide locorregionalmente avanzado de cabeza y cuello. Estudio fase II.

BACKGROUND: Surgery, radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone (RTA) constitute conventional treatment regimes for advanced stages of squamous cell carcinoma originating in the head and neck mucosa. Nevertheless, the results in advanced regional carcinoma (ARC) are disappointing. The chemotherapy-radiotherapy (CHT-RT) association has shown to be superior to RTA in irresectable disease and in resectable disease it could substitute initial surgery as a rescue alternative. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to report the response rate and toxicity of concurrent treatment with Gemcitabine and Radiotherapy (GRT) in patients with ARC. In a prospective design, patients with ARC received concurrent GRT; the global, complete and partial response rate as well as toxicity were assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 patients were included, 5 women and 10 men, 73% in stage IVa; 13/15 showed a global response (87%), a complete response was observed in 9 cases (60%) (RC) and 2 showed progress. RESULTS: All patients included showed toxicity, the most frequent one was level 4 mucositis in 46%, of this 40% required nutritional support by catheter or gastrostomy. One patient in RC died due to sepsis. None of them suspended treatment. CONCLUSION: The GRT association offers a complete response rate of 60%; nevertheless morbidity was not insignificant; randomized studies with a larger number of patients will be required to allow us to outline the optimal therapeutic scheme.

Tratamiento concomitante con gemcitabina y radioterapia en pacientes con carcinoma epidermoide locorregionalmente avanzado de cabeza y cuello: estudio fase II / Concomitant treatment with gemcitabine and radiotherapy in patients with advanced stages of epidermoid carcinoma originating in the head and neck: a phase II sutdy

Antecedentes: En casos avanzados el tratamiento clásico del carcinoma epidermoide originado en mucosas de cabeza y cuello es cirugíaradioterapia o radioterapia sola (RTS). Sin embargo los resultados en carcinoma localmente avanzado (CLA) son decepcionantes. La asociación quimioterapia-radioterapia (QT-RT) ha demostrado ser superior a RTS en enfermedad irresecable y, en enfermedad resecable podría sustituir a la cirugía inicial y dejarla como rescate. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es conocer la tasa de respuesta y la toxicidad del tratamiento concomitante Gemcitabina-Radioterapia (GRT) en pacientes con CLA. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo en el que pacientes con CLA recibieron GRT concomitante; se evaluó la tasa de respuesta global, completa, parcial y la toxicidad. Se incluyeron 15 pacientes, 5 mujeres y 10 hombres, 73% en etapa IVa. Resultados: Trece de 15 pacientes tuvieron respuesta global (87%), en 9(60%) fue completa (RC) y 2 tuvieron progresión. Todos tuvieron toxicidad, la más frecuente fue mucositis grado 4 en 46%; de éstos 40% requirió apoyo nutricio por sonda o gastrostomía. Un paciente en RC murió por sepsis. Ninguno abandonó el tratamiento. Conclusiones: La asociación GRT ofrece tasa de respuesta completa en 60%; sin embargo, la morbilidad no es despreciable; se requieren estudios aleatorizados con mayor número de pacientes que permitan definir el mejor esquema terapéutico.

BACKGROUND: Surgery, radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone (RTA) constitute conventional treatment regimes for advanced stages of squamous cell carcinoma originating in the head and neck mucosa. Nevertheless, the results in advanced regional carcinoma (ARC) are disappointing. The chemotherapy-radiotherapy (CHT-RT) association has shown to be superior to RTA in irresectable disease and in resectable disease it could substitute initial surgery as a rescue alternative. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to report the response rate and toxicity of concurrent treatment with Gemcitabine and Radiotherapy (GRT) in patients with ARC. In a prospective design, patients with ARC received concurrent GRT; the global, complete and partial response rate as well as toxicity were assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 patients were included, 5 women and 10 men, 73% in stage IVa; 13/15 showed a global response (87%), a complete response was observed in 9 cases (60%) (RC) and 2 showed progress. RESULTS: All patients included showed toxicity, the most frequent one was level 4 mucositis in 46%, of this 40% required nutritional support by catheter or gastrostomy. One patient in RC died due to sepsis. None of them suspended treatment. CONCLUSION: The GRT association offers a complete response rate of 60%; nevertheless morbidity was not insignificant; randomized studies with a larger number of patients will be required to allow us to outline the optimal therapeutic scheme.